Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Opel Meriva 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 115 HP | 70 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 265 NM | 125 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 14.5 seconds | 11.3 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 5.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Meriva. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1410 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star has 10 litres more trunk space than the Opel Meriva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Meriva (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`844 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Opel Meriva has
| |