Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Hyundai Matrix 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.5 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 115 HP | 82 - 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 265 NM | 141 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 14.5 seconds | 11.3 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 5.4 - 9.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Matrix. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Matrix. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.64 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai Matrix, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1284 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star has 16 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Matrix. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`813 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Hyundai Matrix has
| |