Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 115 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 265 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.4 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 21 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`276 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |