Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Fiat Punto 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 115 HP | 60 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 265 NM | 102 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.4 seconds | 8.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.8 | 4.5 - 8.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Punto. On average, Mitsubishi Space Star equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 21 cm longer than the Fiat Punto, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 264 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Punto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`276 | ~ 1`493 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Fiat Punto has
| |