Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 295 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |