Mitsubishi Outlander 2009 vs Subaru Forester 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 172 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 2 HP less power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 3 NM more than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Outlander is 11 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 774 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 324 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |