Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 5 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 6 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 128 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1608 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 369 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |