Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar F-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 30 HP less power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Pace, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 128 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1608 litres | 650 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 380 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 958 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |