Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander 2006. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 is larger. Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 292 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1691 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 (by 101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, which means Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`175 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander 2013, so Mitsubishi Outlander 2013 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |