Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 18 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.82 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 14 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`688 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |