Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 28 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 32 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 103 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |