Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Outlander torque is 30 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.5 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 15 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 736 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |