Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 28 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 32 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 103 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |