Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 2 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 10.1 | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 952 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 123 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 753 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |