Mitsubishi Outlander 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 14 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 952 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 123 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 753 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`995 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |