Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 vs Peugeot 4007 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 10 HP less power than Peugeot 4007, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Peugeot 4007. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.3 | |
|
The Peugeot 4007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 4007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is smaller. Mitsubishi Outlander is 10 cm shorter than the Peugeot 4007, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1686 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 108 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 4007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 4007, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Peugeot 4007 has
| |