Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander 2006. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
986 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 has 321 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 (by 705 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander 2006, which means Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander 2012, so Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |