Mitsubishi Outlander 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Outlander engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Outlander reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.5 | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 29 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
986 litres | 1752 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has 5 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 766 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |