Mitsubishi Outlander 2005 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 220 HP | 136 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 310 NM | 194 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 11.2 seconds | 9.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 10.6 | 6.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 20 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | 1470 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Outlander has 45 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Outlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 221 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`331 | ~ 2`134 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |