Mitsubishi Outlander 2005 vs Subaru Forester 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 220 HP | 147 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 310 NM | 196 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 11.2 seconds | 6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 10.6 | 6.3 - 11.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Outlander is 4 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Outlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1691 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 91 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`331 | ~ 2`016 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |