Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 230 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 208 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 12 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.7 - 10.6 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Mitsubishi Outlander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander is 14 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Outlander has 47 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 172 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Outlander is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mitsubishi Outlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`182 | ~ 2`059 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Outlander has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |