Mitsubishi Lancer 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 1997

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
1996 - 2001
Toyota Corolla
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.3 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP86 HP
Torque: 108 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds16.1 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.9
Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway750 km on highway

Engines

Engine production duration: 27 years12 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi ColtUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.30 m
Width: 1.69 m1.69 m
Height: 1.40 m1.38 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer and Toyota Corolla are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data390 litres
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters9.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0501`600
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): no data600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer has
Toyota Corolla has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv