Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Honda Civic 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 98 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 152 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 12 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
680 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer is 2 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 450 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Lancer has 20 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Lancer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`570 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Civic has
| |