Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Mitsubishi Lancer
2008 - 2010
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 198 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds9.1 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Lancer torque is 11 NM more than Mazda 3. Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.17.4
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway960 km on highway

Engines

Engine production duration: 18 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.49 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres430 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Lancer has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mitsubishi Lancer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`790
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 28003600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv