Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996 vs Toyota Celica 1994

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
1996 - 1998
Toyota Celica
1994 - 1999
Body: SedanCoupe
Gearbox: Manual Manual
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Celica also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.01.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 280 HP116 - 242 HP
Torque: 353 NM154 - 302 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds6.1 - 10.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.87.9 - 9.5
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.33 m4.42 m
Width: 1.69 m1.75 m
Height: 1.42 m1.30 m
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data283 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica.
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 1`635
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 22 2002000
Pros and Cons:
    Toyota Celica has
    • also available in 2WD
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv