Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 - 359 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 - 492 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.1 - 6.3 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`040 | ~ 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 37 400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |