Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2011

 
Mitsubishi L 200
2010 - 2015
Ford Ranger
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 178 HP150 HP
Torque: 400 NM375 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds11.8 seconds
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford Ranger. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.3
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km9.6 l/100km
By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1060 km on highway
750 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.19 m5.36 m
Width: 1.75 m1.85 m
Height: 1.78 m1.71 m
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi L 200 is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data1450 litres
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`9003`200
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 11 20018 200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv