Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Isuzu Trooper 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 25 HP less power than Isuzu Trooper, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Isuzu Trooper. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 85 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm shorter than the Isuzu Trooper, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | 2`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Isuzu Trooper has
| |