Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 335 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 50 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 18 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 24 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 969 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |