Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 178 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 - 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 17.8 seconds | 12.7 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.7 | 7.3 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 14 cm shorter than the Isuzu D-Max, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`875 | ~ 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |