Mitsubishi Grandis 2004 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Grandis engine produces 22 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Grandis reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.0 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Grandis consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Grandis could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Grandis is 29 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Grandis is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1545 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Grandis is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Grandis has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |