Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 53 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt and Hyundai Getz are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 977 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 99 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |