Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Audi TT 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Smart ForFour | Used also on Audi A4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 30 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 60 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Audi TT has
| |