Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 2000

 
Mitsubishi Colt
1996 - 2001
Toyota Corolla
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP110 HP
Torque: 137 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds11.6 seconds
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 20 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.28.0
Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway760 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 3.88 m4.29 m
Width: 1.68 m1.69 m
Height: 1.36 m1.38 m
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller.
Mitsubishi Colt is 41 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 240 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10 meters9.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

high
Toyota Corolla has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • lower price
Toyota Corolla has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv