Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Toyota Auris 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 5 HP more power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Toyota Auris. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 41 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1355 litres | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 134 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Auris (by 595 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |