Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Opel Agila 2008

 
Mitsubishi Colt
2005 - 2007
Opel Agila
2008 - 2015
Body: HatchbackMinivan / MPV
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 95 HP86 HP
Torque: 125 NM114 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds14.8 seconds
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 9 HP more power than Opel Agila, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Opel Agila. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Agila, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Agila.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway910 km on highway
670 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Agila engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 20 years12 years
Engine spread: Used also on Smart ForFourUsed also on Suzuki Splash
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m3.74 m
Width: 1.70 m1.68 m
Height: 1.52 m1.59 m
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower.
Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm longer than the Opel Agila, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 155 litres225 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
760 litres660 litres
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 70 litres less trunk space than the Opel Agila. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 100 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters9.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.2 metres more than that of the Opel Agila, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4351`485
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Opel Agila has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Agila, so Opel Agila quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 16002400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Opel Agila has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv