Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
| By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 15 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
400 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 40 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 615 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |