Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 7 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, but torque is 5 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 977 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 34 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Getz (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |