Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 5 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 31 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Colt has 190 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. The Toyota Corolla may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |