Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Fiat Punto 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Fiat Punto is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt and Fiat Punto have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Colt torque is 3 NM less than Fiat Punto. Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm longer than the Fiat Punto, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | 297 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1080 litres | |
|
Fiat Punto has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 142 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Punto. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 320 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.3 metres more than that of the Fiat Punto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Punto has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Fiat Punto has
| |