Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Suzuki Swift 2004

 
Mitsubishi Colt
2007 - 2008
Suzuki Swift
2004 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP70 HP
Torque: 210 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds14.2 seconds
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 25 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.64.6
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1120 km on highway
850 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.87 m3.70 m
Width: 1.70 m1.69 m
Height: 1.55 m1.50 m
Mitsubishi Colt is larger.
Mitsubishi Colt is 18 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres213 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
854 litres562 litres
Mitsubishi Colt has 7 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 292 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`525
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data2400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Suzuki Swift has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv