Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Ford Fiesta 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 109 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 13 HP more power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Ford Fiesta. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | 979 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 75 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 53 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |