Mitsubishi Colt 2008 vs Hyundai i20 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 78 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 17 HP more power than Hyundai i20. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt and Hyundai i20 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1032 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i20 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |