Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Mercedes A class 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 82 - 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 140 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.4 seconds | 7.3 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.8 | 4.9 - 7.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes A class. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes A class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes A class, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1995 litres | |
|
Mercedes A class has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 215 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes A class. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes A class (by 1235 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes A class. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`482 | ~ 1`733 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mercedes A klase has
| |