Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Ford Fiesta 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.4 seconds | 8.4 - 17.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.8 | 4.3 - 7.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 947 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 64 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 187 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`482 | ~ 1`562 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |