Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.4 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.8 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 160 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 563 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`482 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |