Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Opel Astra 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Colt
2007 - 2008
Opel Astra
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 1.51.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 75 - 150 HP80 - 200 HP
Torque: 100 - 210 NM125 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 12.9 seconds7.9 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 6.84.9 - 9.4
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Astra. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m4.25 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.52 m1.46 m
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi Colt is 44 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
400 litres1330 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Colt has 160 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 930 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Astra.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`463~ 1`799
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): no data1400
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Opel Astra has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv