Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Smart ForFour 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 64 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 92 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.5 seconds | 6.9 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.8 | 4.6 - 6.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Smart ForFour. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 11 cm longer than the Smart ForFour, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 910 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 232 litres more trunk space than the Smart ForFour. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.3 metres more than that of the Smart ForFour. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`497 | ~ 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Smart ForFour has
| |