Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Swift can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 70 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 116 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.4 seconds | 10 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.2 | 4.6 - 6.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. On average, a Mitsubishi Colt with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 17 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
854 litres | 562 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 7 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 292 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |