Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Nissan Note 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 109 HP | 68 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 128 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.4 seconds | 10.7 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.2 | 5.1 - 7.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. On average, Mitsubishi Colt equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
854 litres | 1332 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 60 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 478 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`576 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Nissan Note has
| |